Compare engines

Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 Lite

This page compares Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 Lite on MaxVideoAI using the same prompts, side-by-side renders, key specs, and a scorecard across 11 criteria. Use it to shortlist the best fit — then open each engine profile for full specs and prompt examples.

8.5/10Score

Seedance 2.0

Strengths: Flagship multi-shot video with native audio and references

7.2/10Score

Google Veo 3.1 Lite

Strengths: Budget Veo drafts

Scorecard (Side-by-Side)

Scores reflect quality and control on MaxVideoAI across 11 criteria.

8.6

Prompt Adherence

iprompt alignment / instruction following
7.8
8.8

Visual Quality

iimage quality / aesthetic quality / realism / artifacts / flicker
6.7
8.7

Motion Realism

imotion smoothness / physics plausibility
7.2
8.2

Temporal Consistency

itemporal coherence / identity consistency
6.7
8.4

Human Fidelity

ifaces / hands / body realism
7.3
7.0

Text & UI Legibility

itext rendering / readability
6.1
9.2

Audio & Lip Sync

ilip sync quality / dialogue sync
8.1
8.4

Multi-Shot Sequencing

ishot-to-shot continuity / multi-shot
7.3
8.8

Controllability

icamera control / constraint following
7.5
7.4

Speed & Stability

ilatency / success rate
9.0
4.8

Pricing

iprice per second / credits / estimated cost
9.4

Winner summary

Leads on scorecard

Seedance 2.0 leads on 9/11 (best: Visual Quality, Motion Realism).

Cheaper on MaxVideoAI

Cheaper: Google Veo 3.1 Lite (480p: $0.18/s vs 720p: $0.07/s).

Max duration

Max duration: Seedance 2.0 (15s vs 8s).

Key Specs (Side-by-Side)

Compare key AI video model specs side-by-side (pricing, inputs, resolution, duration, aspect ratios, audio, and core controls). This is a high-level snapshot — see the full engine profile for the complete feature set and prompt examples.

Seedance 2.0Key specGoogle Veo 3.1 Lite
480p: $0.18/s
1080p: $0.89/s
Pricing (MaxVideoAI)
720p: $0.07/s
1080p: $0.10/s
Text-to-Video
Image-to-Video
Video-to-Video
First/Last frame
Ref2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start image
Reference image / style reference
Start image only; no style-reference stack
Ref2V: up to 3 video references
Reference video
1080p
Max resolution
1080p
15s
Max duration
8s
145s avg
Avg render time
55s avg
Auto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:16
Aspect ratios
16:9 / 9:16
24
FPS options
24 fps
MP4
Output format
MP4
Audio output
Native audio generation
Lip sync
Advanced
Camera / motion controls
Basic
No (MaxVideoAI)
Watermark
No (MaxVideoAI)

Showdown (same prompt)

Side-by-side renders from the same prompt on MaxVideoAI. Prompts are identical; outputs may vary by model.

Showing up to 3 prompt pairs for clarity.

Fast Motion + Physics (16:9)

What it tests: Motion Realism + Temporal Consistency + Visual Quality

Prompt
Source prompt

Wide 16:9 cinematic action shot, a runner sprints through a rainy city street at night, water splashes realistically with each step, reflections on wet asphalt, handheld tracking camera following from the side. Dynamic motion with believable inertia and physics, no rubbery limbs, no wobbling background, stable scene geometry, minimal temporal flicker, sharp details despite fast movement, realistic motion blur.

Seedance 2.0

Google Veo 3.1 Lite

Try this prompt:Generate with Seedance 2.0Generate with Veo 3.1 LiteOpens the generator pre-filled.

UGC Talking Head + Lip Sync (9:16)

What it tests: Human Fidelity + Audio/Lip Sync + Prompt Adherence

Prompt
Source prompt

Vertical 9:16 TikTok-style UGC selfie video, handheld smartphone feel, natural indoor daylight near a window. A friendly creator speaks directly to camera with natural blinking, subtle head nods, and a warm smile. Add small human imperfections: a tiny hesitation, a soft breath, a quick smile mid-sentence, and a micro-pause before the last line. Realistic skin texture, stable identity, no face warping, minimal flicker, clean audio with natural room tone. No subtitles. No on-screen text. No logos. No watermarks. The creator says (exactly, with the same pacing and hesitations): “Okay, so… um… quick thing. If you’re feeling stuck, just do the tiniest first step… like, set a two-minute timer and start. (smiles) That’s it. You’ll be surprised how fast it gets easier.”

Seedance 2.0

Google Veo 3.1 Lite

Try this prompt:Generate with Seedance 2.0Generate with Veo 3.1 LiteOpens the generator pre-filled.

Hands + Product Demo + On-screen Text

What it tests: Hands/Fingers + Text & UI Legibility + Prompt Adherence

Prompt
Source prompt

Wide 16:9 full-body unboxing video in a clean studio/kitchen setting. A person is fully visible (head-to-toe or at least head-to-knees) standing behind a minimalist tabletop. They unbox a small generic gadget from a plain matte cardboard box: peel the seal, open the lid, remove the inner tray, take out the device and accessories, and lay everything neatly on the table. The person occasionally lifts the item toward the camera for a closer look, then places it back down. Realism requirements: natural body proportions, stable identity, realistic skin and clothing fabric, no face warping, no unnatural limb bending. Hands must be highly realistic: correct finger count, natural grip, believable pressure/contact with the box and device, consistent shadows, no extra fingers, no “floating” objects. Keep object geometry stable, no wobbling background, minimal temporal flicker. Camera: single continuous shot, tripod-stable, slight cinematic push-in (very slow), eye-level or slightly above table height. Natural soft daylight, clean shadows, realistic materials and textures. No logos, no brand names, no watermarks. No subtitles. Optional on-screen title at the top (perfectly readable and stable, no jitter): "UNBOXING — FIRST LOOK"

Seedance 2.0

Google Veo 3.1 Lite

Try this prompt:Generate with Seedance 2.0Generate with Veo 3.1 LiteOpens the generator pre-filled.

This side-by-side AI video comparison uses identical prompts to highlight differences in motion, realism, human fidelity, and text legibility. For full specs, controls, and more prompt examples, open each engine profile.

FAQ

Quick answers about Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 Lite on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).

What are Seedance 2.0 and Google Veo 3.1 Lite?

Seedance 2.0 and Google Veo 3.1 Lite are AI video generation engines available on MaxVideoAI. This page compares them side-by-side using the same prompts, key specs, and performance data shown above.

Which is better: Seedance 2.0 or Google Veo 3.1 Lite?

It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and the “same prompt” showdowns to compare prompt adherence, motion realism, human fidelity, and text legibility — then open each engine profile for full details.

Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?

Pricing varies by engine and settings (duration, resolution, audio). Currently, Seedance 2.0 starts at 480p: $0.18/s and Google Veo 3.1 Lite starts at 720p: $0.07/s (see “Pricing (MaxVideoAI)” for details).

What are the biggest differences between Seedance 2.0 and Google Veo 3.1 Lite?
  • Native audio generation: Seedance 2.0 is supported vs Google Veo 3.1 Lite is supported (always on).
  • Max resolution: data is still being validated for one or both engines.
Do they support Text-to-Video / Image-to-Video / Video-to-Video?

On MaxVideoAI: Text-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Image-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Video-to-Video is Not supported vs Not supported. Some fields may still be under validation.

Do they support First/Last frame or references?

First/Last frame is Supported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v) vs Supported (one start image + one last frame). Reference image/style is Ref2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start image vs Start image only; no style-reference stack; Reference video is Ref2V: up to 3 video references vs Not supported.

What are the max resolution, duration, and aspect ratios?

Max output is 1080p / 15s for Seedance 2.0 and 1080p / 8s for Google Veo 3.1 Lite. Supported aspect ratios include Auto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:16 vs 16:9 / 9:16 (see Key Specs for the full list).

Do they support audio generation and lip sync?

Audio output is Supported vs Supported. Native audio generation is Supported vs Supported (always on), and lip sync is Supported vs Supported (some fields may still be under validation).

Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?

No. MaxVideoAI exports are watermark-free (“Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI)”).

Why do results look different with the same prompt?

Even with identical prompts, models interpret instructions differently and use different training data and generation strategies. That’s why the Showdown section exists: same prompt, side-by-side outputs.

Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?

Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/seedance-2-0 and /models/veo-3-1-lite. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.