Compare engines

Happy Horse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0

This page compares Happy Horse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0 on MaxVideoAI using key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 11 criteria. Curated side-by-side videos will be added once model-specific renders are available.

8.3/10Score

Happy Horse 1.1

Strengths: Alibaba native-audio text, image and reference video

8.5/10Score

Seedance 2.0

Strengths: Flagship multi-shot video with native audio and references

Scorecard (Side-by-Side)

Scores reflect quality and control on MaxVideoAI across 11 criteria.

Happy Horse 1.1CriteriaSeedance 2.0

8.4

Prompt Adherence

iprompt alignment / instruction following

8.6

8.3

Visual Quality

iimage quality / aesthetic quality / realism / artifacts / flicker

8.8

8.3

Motion Realism

imotion smoothness / physics plausibility

8.7

8.2

Temporal Consistency

itemporal coherence / identity consistency

8.2

Human Fidelity

ifaces / hands / body realism

8.4

7.0

Text & UI Legibility

itext rendering / readability

7.0

9.0

Audio & Lip Sync

ilip sync quality / dialogue sync

9.2

7.8

Multi-Shot Sequencing

ishot-to-shot continuity / multi-shot

8.4

8.3

Controllability

icamera control / constraint following

8.8

6.8

Speed & Stability

ilatency / success rate

7.4

8.2

Pricing

iprice per second / credits / estimated cost

4.8

Winner summary

Leads on scorecard

Seedance 2.0 leads on 8/11 (best: Multi-Shot Sequencing, Speed & Stability).

Cheaper on MaxVideoAI

Cheaper: Happy Horse 1.1 (720p: $0.18/s vs 480p: $0.18/s).

First/Last frame

First/Last frame: Seedance 2.0 (First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported vs Supported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v)).

Generate with

Happy Horse 1.1

Full engine profile

Generate with

Seedance 2.0

Full engine profile

Key Specs (Side-by-Side)

Compare key AI video model specs side-by-side (pricing, inputs, resolution, duration, aspect ratios, audio, and core controls). This is a high-level snapshot — see the full engine profile for the complete feature set and prompt examples.

Happy Horse 1.1Key specSeedance 2.0

720p: $0.18/s

1080p: $0.23/s

Pricing (MaxVideoAI)

480p: $0.18/s

1080p: $0.89/s

Text-to-Video

Image-to-Video

Video-to-Video

First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported

First/Last frame

Reference image / style reference

Ref2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start image

Reference video

Ref2V: up to 3 video references

1080p

Max resolution

1080p

15s output

Max duration

15s

1230s avg

Avg render time

3777s avg

16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 / 5:4 / 4:5

Aspect ratios

Auto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:16

24 fps

FPS options

MP4

Output format

MP4

Audio output

Native audio generation

Lip sync

Basic

Camera / motion controls

Advanced

No (MaxVideoAI)

Watermark

No (MaxVideoAI)

Related comparisons

Explore a few more popular side-by-side matchups.

Happy Horse 1.1 vs Google Veo 3.1 Happy Horse 1.1 vs Kling 3 Pro Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1

FAQ

Quick answers about Happy Horse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0 on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).

What are Happy Horse 1.1 and Seedance 2.0?

Happy Horse 1.1 and Seedance 2.0 are AI video generation engines available on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.

Which is better: Happy Horse 1.1 or Seedance 2.0?

It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.

Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?

Pricing varies by engine and settings (duration, resolution, audio). Currently, Happy Horse 1.1 starts at 720p: $0.18/s and Seedance 2.0 starts at 480p: $0.18/s (see “Pricing (MaxVideoAI)” for details).

What are the biggest differences between Happy Horse 1.1 and Seedance 2.0?

First/Last frame: Happy Horse 1.1 is first frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported vs Seedance 2.0 is supported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v).
Max resolution: data is still being validated for one or both engines.

Do they support Text-to-Video / Image-to-Video / Video-to-Video?

On MaxVideoAI: Text-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Image-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Video-to-Video is Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route vs Not supported. Some fields may still be under validation.

Do they support First/Last frame or references?

First/Last frame is First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported vs Supported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v). Reference image/style is Supported (1-9 reference stills) vs Ref2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start image; Reference video is Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route vs Ref2V: up to 3 video references.

What are the max resolution, duration, and aspect ratios?

Max output is 1080p / 15s output for Happy Horse 1.1 and 1080p / 15s for Seedance 2.0. Supported aspect ratios include 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 / 5:4 / 4:5 vs Auto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:16 (see Key Specs for the full list).

Do they support audio generation and lip sync?

Audio output is Supported vs Supported. Native audio generation is Supported vs Supported, and lip sync is Supported vs Supported (some fields may still be under validation).

Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?

No. MaxVideoAI exports are watermark-free (“Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI)”).

Why can results differ between these models?

Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently. Curated side-by-side videos will be added once model-specific renders are available.

Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?

Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/happy-horse-1-1 and /models/seedance-2-0. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.

Back to comparisons