Happy Horse 1.1
8.3/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Follows your prompt
Compare engines
Happy Horse 1.1 vs Google Veo 3.1
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Compare Happy Horse 1.1 and Google Veo 3.1 by key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 10 criteria.
Google Veo 3.1
7.9/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Follows your prompt
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Happy Horse 1.1
Explore examples
Google Veo 3.1
Explore examples
Compare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Happy Horse 1.1 · Google Veo 3.1
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Happy Horse 1.1 | Google Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Happy Horse 1.18.4/10 | Google Veo 3.18.4/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | Google Veo 3.18.1/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | Google Veo 3.17.9/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Happy Horse 1.18.2/10 | Google Veo 3.18.2/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Happy Horse 1.19.0/10 | Google Veo 3.19.0/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | Google Veo 3.18.3/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Happy Horse 1.1 | Google Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Happy Horse 1.18.2/10 | Google Veo 3.17.4/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Happy Horse 1.17.0/10 | Google Veo 3.17.2/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Happy Horse 1.17.8/10 | Google Veo 3.17.8/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Happy Horse 1.16.8/10 | Google Veo 3.17.4/10 |
Generate with
Happy Horse 1.1
Generate with
Google Veo 3.1
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Happy Horse 1.1
Text to video4 s16:9audio on
- 480p
- $0.37per video · $0.0925/s
- 720p
- $0.73per video · $0.1825/s
- 1080p
- $0.94per video · $0.235/s
Google Veo 3.1
Text to video4 s16:9audio on
- 720p
- $2.08per video · $0.52/s
- 1080p
- $2.08per video · $0.52/s
- 4K
- $3.12per video · $0.78/s
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Happy Horse 1.1
- 15 s
- Google Veo 3.1
- 8 s
Max resolution
- Happy Horse 1.1
- 1080p
- Google Veo 3.1
- 4K
Audio output
- Happy Horse 1.1
- Supported
- Google Veo 3.1
- Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Happy Horse 1.1 | Google Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | 480p: $0.0925/s720p: $0.1825/s1080p: $0.235/s | 720p: $0.52/s1080p: $0.52/s4K: $0.78/s |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route | Supported (Extend from one source video) |
| First/Last frame | First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported | Supported |
| Reference image / style reference | Supported (1-9 reference stills) | Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference-to-Video: 1-3 stills |
| Reference video | Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route | Supported (one source clip for Extend) |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| New clip · maximum | 15 sText to video, Image to video, Image references: 3–15 s | 8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s |
| Extension · added duration | Not supported | 7 s |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 / 5:4 / 4:5 | 16:9 / 9:16 |
| FPS options | 24 fps | 24 fps |
| Output format | MP4 | MP4 |
| Audio output | Supported | Supported |
| Native audio generation | Supported | Supported |
| Lip sync | Supported | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Basic | Prompt-based only |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No visible MaxVideoAI watermark; provider/model provenance markers may apply |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Happy Horse 1.1: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5) · fal.ai (6)
Google Veo 3.1: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)
Related comparisons
Explore a few more popular side-by-side matchups.
Happy Horse 1.1 vs Google Veo 3.1 FastHappy Horse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0Happy Horse 1.1 vs Kling 3 ProOpenAI Sora 2 vs Google Veo 3.1
Continue this comparison in your AI assistant 11 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Quick answers about Happy Horse 1.1 vs Google Veo 3.1 on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
Which is better: Happy Horse 1.1 or Google Veo 3.1?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — Text to video · 4 s · 16:9 · audio on; 480p: $0.37 per video ($0.0925/s); 720p: $0.73 per video ($0.1825/s); 1080p: $0.94 per video ($0.235/s).
- Google Veo 3.1 — Text to video · 4 s · 16:9 · audio on; 720p: $2.08 per video ($0.52/s); 1080p: $2.08 per video ($0.52/s); 4K: $3.12 per video ($0.78/s).
- Compare equivalent settings. These are estimates in USD, not reserved quotes.
What are the biggest differences between Happy Horse 1.1 and Google Veo 3.1?
- Reference image / style reference — Happy Horse 1.1: supported (1-9 reference stills); Google Veo 3.1: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference-to-Video: 1-3 stills.
- Max resolution: Happy Horse 1.1 is 1080p vs Google Veo 3.1 is 4K.
Can I start from text, an image or a video?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route.
- Google Veo 3.1 — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (Extend from one source video).
Can I use start and end frames or references?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — First/Last frame: First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported; Reference image / style reference: Supported (1-9 reference stills); Reference video: Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route.
- Google Veo 3.1 — First/Last frame: Supported; Reference image / style reference: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference-to-Video: 1-3 stills; Reference video: Supported (one source clip for Extend).
What resolutions, durations and aspect ratios are available?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — Max resolution: 1080p; New clip · maximum: 15 s. Text to video, Image to video, Image references: 3–15 s. Extension · added duration: Not supported. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 / 5:4 / 4:5. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
- Google Veo 3.1 — Max resolution: 4K; New clip · maximum: 8 s. Text to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s; Image references: 8 s. Extension · added duration: 7 s. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Can the models generate audio and lip sync?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
- Happy Horse 1.1 — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
- Google Veo 3.1 — Watermark: No visible MaxVideoAI watermark; provider/model provenance markers may apply.
Why can results differ between these models?
Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/happy-horse-1-1 and /models/veo-3-1. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.
What are Happy Horse 1.1 and Google Veo 3.1?
Happy Horse 1.1 and Google Veo 3.1 are AI video generation engines documented on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.