Happy Horse 1.1
8.3/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Follows your prompt
Compare engines
Happy Horse 1.1 vs LTX 2.3 Pro
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Use Happy Horse 1.1 when the story depends on native audio, lip-sync, dialogue, and reference characters in short marketing or UGC scenes. Use LTX 2.3 Pro when the project needs longer clips, higher-resolution delivery, 4K headroom, extension or retake workflows, and broader production finishing. This comparison helps separate an audio-first actor model from a more flexible production and editing model.
LTX 2.3 Pro
7.1/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Creative control, Audio & lip sync
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Happy Horse 1.1
Explore examples
LTX 2.3 Pro
Explore examples
Compare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Happy Horse 1.1 · LTX 2.3 Pro
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Happy Horse 1.1 | LTX 2.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Happy Horse 1.18.4/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.6/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.4/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.5/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Happy Horse 1.18.2/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.3/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Happy Horse 1.19.0/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.8/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Happy Horse 1.18.3/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.9/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Happy Horse 1.1 | LTX 2.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Happy Horse 1.18.2/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro6.2/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Happy Horse 1.17.0/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro6.5/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Happy Horse 1.17.8/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro6.5/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Happy Horse 1.16.8/10 | LTX 2.3 Pro7.8/10 |
Generate with
Happy Horse 1.1
Generate with
LTX 2.3 Pro
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Happy Horse 1.1
Text to video6 s16:9audio on
- 480p
- $0.55per video · $0.091667/s
- 720p
- $1.10per video · $0.183333/s
- 1080p
- $1.41per video · $0.235/s
LTX 2.3 Pro
Text to video6 s16:9audio on
- 1080p
- $0.47per video · $0.078333/s
- 1440p
- $0.94per video · $0.156667/s
- 4K
- $1.88per video · $0.313333/s
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Happy Horse 1.1
- 15 s
- LTX 2.3 Pro
- 10 s
Max resolution
- Happy Horse 1.1
- 1080p
- LTX 2.3 Pro
- 4K on T2V/I2V generate; Reframe 720p/1080p; other workflow-specific limits
Audio output
- Happy Horse 1.1
- Supported
- LTX 2.3 Pro
- Supported
Compare all 17 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Happy Horse 1.1 | LTX 2.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | 480p: $0.091667/s720p: $0.183333/s1080p: $0.235/s | 1080p: $0.078333/s1440p: $0.156667/s4K: $0.313333/s |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route | Supported (Extend / Retake / Reframe) |
| First/Last frame | First frame supported via Image-to-Video; last frame not supported | Supported (start + end image in I2V) |
| Reference image / style reference | Supported (1-9 reference stills) | Supported (single start image; no separate style-reference stack) |
| Reference video | Not supported in the current Happy Horse 1.1 route | Supported (Extend / Retake / Reframe) |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K on T2V/I2V generate; Reframe 720p/1080p; other workflow-specific limits |
| New clip · maximum | 15 sText to video, Image to video, Image references: 3–15 s | 10 sText to video, Image to video: 6 / 8 / 10 s |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 / 5:4 / 4:5 | 16:9 generate / 9:16 generate |
| FPS options | 24 fps | 24 fps generate / 25 fps generate / 48 fps generate / 50 fps generate |
| Output format | MP4 | MP4 |
| Audio output | Supported | Supported |
| Native audio generation | Supported | Supported |
| Lip sync | Supported | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Basic | Prompt-based only |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No (MaxVideoAI) |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Happy Horse 1.1: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5) · fal.ai (6)
LTX 2.3 Pro: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5) · fal.ai (6)
Recommended next steps
Related comparisons
Explore a few more popular side-by-side matchups.
Continue this comparison in your AI assistant3 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Short answers for choosing between native-audio character output and LTX production controls.
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
When should I choose Happy Horse 1.1?
Choose Happy Horse 1.1 for native audio, lip-sync, short dialogue scenes, and reference-character work where performance is the main signal.
When should I choose LTX 2.3 Pro?
Choose LTX 2.3 Pro for longer clips, 4K-oriented delivery, extension or retake workflows, and production finishing where visual control matters more than lip-sync.
Which model is better for product ads?
Happy Horse 1.1 is better for spokesperson or UGC-style product ads with dialogue. LTX 2.3 Pro is better for polished product motion, higher-resolution finishing, and edit-heavy production.