Compare engines

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Luma Ray 3.2

See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.

How to choose

Use Seedance 2.0 Mini when the job needs lower-cost Dreamina Seedance batches, ecommerce variants, social hooks, video extension, source-video edits, and native audio tests at 480p or 720p. Use Luma Ray 3.2 when the job depends on Luma-style cinematic motion, Modify Video, Reframe, source-video preservation, guide frames, and 1080p visual control without native audio. This Mini comparison is scorecard-only for now, so it focuses on specs, positioning, and production decision guidance instead of side-by-side videos. Ray 3.2 Extend adds five new seconds forward or backward only from an eligible owned direct Luma generation. Uploaded or copied public videos do not supply that lineage. Creation keyframes and Modify guide frames remain separate and cannot be added to Extend; automatic assembly with the original is not promised.

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini

7.4/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Creative control

Luma Ray 3.2

7.7/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Creative control, Visual quality

Compare what matters

These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.

Score records last updated: Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini · Luma Ray 3.2

How we benchmark
Criterion · 0–10Dreamina Seedance 2.0 MiniLuma Ray 3.2
Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.6/10
Luma Ray 3.27.9/10
Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.4/10
Luma Ray 3.28.0/10
Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.6/10
Luma Ray 3.27.9/10
Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.3/10
Luma Ray 3.27.6/10
Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini6.8/10
Luma Ray 3.2N/A
Creative controlHow much direction the model follows.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.7/10
Luma Ray 3.28.4/10
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
Criterion · 0–10Dreamina Seedance 2.0 MiniLuma Ray 3.2
Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.0/10
Luma Ray 3.27.4/10
Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini6.4/10
Luma Ray 3.26.4/10
Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.1/10
Luma Ray 3.27.2/10
Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini7.8/10
Luma Ray 3.26.6/10

What will your video cost?

Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini

Text to video5 s16:9audio on
720p
$0.39per video · $0.078/s
480p
$0.43per video · $0.086/s

Luma Ray 3.2

Text to video5 s16:9audio off
540p
$0.65per video · $0.13/s
720p
$1.30per video · $0.26/s
1080p
$2.60per video · $0.52/s

Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated

Formats, inputs and controls

Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.

New clip · maximum

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini
15 s
Luma Ray 3.2
10 s

Max resolution

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini
480p / 720p
Luma Ray 3.2
1080p

Audio output

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini
Supported
Luma Ray 3.2
Not supported
Compare all 19 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini / Luma Ray 3.2 — Key spec
Key specDreamina Seedance 2.0 MiniLuma Ray 3.2
Pricing (MaxVideoAI)720p: $0.078/s480p: $0.086/s540p: $0.13/s720p: $0.26/s1080p: $0.52/s
Text-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Image-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Video-to-VideoSupported (video edit and extend)Supported (Modify / Reframe / owned-generation Extend)
First/Last frameSupported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v)Supported (I2V end frame plus Modify guide/keyframes up to 64 anchors)
Reference image / style referenceRef2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start imageSupported through guide frames and indexed Modify keyframes
Reference videoSupported (up to 3 video references, video edit, or extension clips)Supported (Modify / Reframe / owned-generation Extend)
Max resolution480p / 720p1080p
New clip · maximum15 sText to video, Image to video, Image references: 4–15 s10 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 s
Extension · added duration4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 s5 s
Observed median (30 days)155sP90: 174s · Nov 9, 2026Data pending
Aspect ratiosAuto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:169:16 / 3:4 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 16:9 / 21:9
FPS options24 fps24 fps
Output formatMP4MP4
Audio outputSupportedNot supported
Native audio generationSupportedNot supported
Lip syncSupportedNot supported
Camera / motion controlsAdvancedPrompt, source-video preservation, guide frames and Modify keyframes
WatermarkNo (MaxVideoAI)No (MaxVideoAI)

Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.

Observed production times over 30 days; settings and queues vary. P90 means 90% of measured renders finished within this time. These are not controlled speed tests. Measurement method and limitations

Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 Mini: maxvideoai.com · Dreamina Seedance API model id: dreamina-seedance-2-0-mini-260615

Luma Ray 3.2: maxvideoai.com · docs.agents.lumalabs.ai · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2)

Recommended next steps

Related comparisons

Explore a few more popular side-by-side matchups.

Continue this comparison in your AI assistant
4 questions to help you choose

FAQ

Short answers for choosing between Seedance Mini batch value and Luma Ray 3.2 video-control workflows.

Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.

When should I choose Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Choose Mini for lower-cost batch variants, UGC hooks, product tests, video extension, source-video edits, and native audio experiments where 480p or 720p is acceptable.

When is Luma Ray 3.2 the better fit?

Choose Luma Ray 3.2 for Modify Video, Reframe, guide-frame control, source-video preservation, cinematic motion, and 1080p visual tests where native audio is not required.

Why is this page scorecard-only?

Mini comparison pages stay scorecard-only until curated Mini side-by-side renders are selected, so this page prioritizes specs, workflow positioning, and cost tradeoffs.

Can I extend an uploaded or public Luma clip?

Ray 3.2 Extend adds five new seconds forward or backward only from an eligible owned direct Luma generation. Uploaded or copied public videos do not supply that lineage. Creation keyframes and Modify guide frames remain separate and cannot be added to Extend; automatic assembly with the original is not promised.